Principles of Dialysis
Indications & Contraindications
Hemodialysis
Hemodialysis related therapies
Peritoneal Dialysis
Other
Minitips

Continuous Arteriovenous Hemofiltration (CAVH)

 

Contents:

Introduction

Mechanism of hemofiltration

Difference between hemodialysis and hemofiltration

Clinical indication of CAVH

Technical aspect

Prescription of CAVH

Nursing care in CAVH

Positives and Negatives of CAVH

Conclusion

 

Introducion

C

ontinuous arteriovenous hemofiltration is an extracorporeal treatment in which fluid , electrolyte ,and low and middle molecular weight solute are removed from the body by convective transport. The cellular elements and protein contents are conserved. The blood enters the exteacorporeal circuit by an arterial access, flows through a hemofilter, and returns to the patient via venous access. The technique utilizes the patient's own cardiac output and arterial pressure to move the blood in the circuit and a large volume of ultrafiltrate with the same characteristics of plasma is generated. Typically 10-15 liters fluid and solute are removed per day. Therefore concomitant administration of balanced replacement solution is required. The substitution  of the amount of fluid lost by ultrafiltration with sterile replacement solution permit  correction of  electrolyte, acid base abnormalities and lower the patient’s BUN concentration. The credit of this technique goes to Peter Kramer when he observed that the arterial  blood pressure is sufficient to produce ultrfiltration [1,2].

Top

Mechanism of hemofiltration

The mechanism underlying hemofiltration involves the use of a transmembrane pressure gradient. This pressure gradient is achieved by the net difference between hydrostatic and osmotic pressures. The hydrostatic pressure consists of  a-The arterial blood pressure(systolic blood pressure more than 80 mmHg), which drives the fluid across the membrane into the ultrafiltrate compartment. b-The pressure exerted by the fluid within the ultrafiltrate system, which drives fluid from the fibers into the ultrafiltrate. The pressure opposing the hydrostatic pressure is the colloidal osmotic pressure exerted by plasma proteins.

Top

Difference between hemodialysis and hemofiltration

The basic difference between hemodialysis and hemofiltration is in the principle of solute transport. During hemodialysis the solutes are removed by diffusion and the fluid by ultrafiltration. During hemofiltration the solute removal is accomplished by convection  that is solvent drag. The fluid removal here likewise takes place by ultrafiltration but in large amount, therefore fluid replacement is essential.

Top

Clinical indication of CAVH: [3,4]

1-Acute renal failure with  cardiovascular instability

2-Acute renal failure in critically ill overhydrated patients who are resistant to diuretics.

e.g. with

a. Chronic heart disease

b. Non cardiogenic pulmonary overhydration

c. Oligoanuric status

 d. Needs for total parenteral nutrition

e. Cerebral edema.

f. Burns.

3-Acute renal failure patients who are critically ill with multiorgan failure.

4-Acute renal failure patients who are critically ill with electrolyte abnormalities

5-Seriously ill chronic renal failure patients with any of the previous indications

6-Drug overdosage.

7-Management diuretic-resistant cardiac failure in non-renal failure patients.

Top

Technical aspect

CAVH does not require complicated equipment [fig 1]. Principally IV infusion pump to regulate the fluid replacement and heparin infusion pump are required. A third pump used to control the ultrafiltration rate is required in the two pump method. The CAVH set contents includes catheters, hemofilter, blood lines, guide wires, introducing needles, ultrafiltrate line and graduated drainage bag.

a-Vascular access

Vascular access should guarantee adequate arteriovenous pressure gradient, low resistance, flexible , biocompatible and clinically well tolerated.

1-Percutanuous cannulation of femoral artery and vein are usually used.

2-Scribner A-V shunt

3-Arteriovenous fistulae or grafts are used as arterial line while peripheral or central vein are used for blood return.

b-Blood lines

The length and the diameter of blood lines are critical in conducting the blood at a given arteriovenous pressure gradient. Reduction of the arterial line(50 cm) and longer venous line(75 cm) permit high hydrostatic pressure inside the hemofilter.

c-Hemofilter

Several small hollow fiber highly permeable membranes are used for CAVH. The membranes are made of polyacrylonitrile or polysulphone with a surface area of 0.2 - 0.5 m2.

d-The ultrafiltration line and drainage bag

The ultrafiltrate flow from the ultrafiltrate port into the drainage bag through the ultrfiltration line. The difference in altitude between the hemofilter and the drainage bag must be 40 to 60 cm to allow the generation of negative pressure inside the hemofilter's ultrafiltrate compartment thus enhancing the ultrafiltration. In some cases suction may be applied at the ultrafiltrate port to increase the negative pressure[5]

e-Fluid replacement

Commercially available replacement solution is typically have the following composition: sodium 140 mmol/L, potassium 0-2 mmol/L, calcium 1.75 mmol/L, magnesium 0.75 mmol/L, chloride 106 mmol/L and lactate 45 mmol/L or acetate 41 mmol/L. If ready made replacement solution is not available several formulae can be used depending on patients requirements.

1.Ringer's lactate + calcium and magnesium as required

2.For hypotensive, acidotic patients or with liver disease infuse bicarbonate -buffered solution by alternating the following two solutions:

a.0.9 saline + calcium and magnesium as required

b.5% dextrose/0.45% saline + 66 mmol sodium bicarbonate ( with 23% sodium chloride if needed to attain the desired sodium level 130-140 mEq/L)

3.For patients with lactic acidosis acetate containing Ringer's solution can be used.

 

Replacement solution  can be infused into the arterial line [predilution] or into the venous line [postdilution]

  • In postdilution blood in the hemofilter can become very concentrated which lead to poor blood flow and clotting specially at high fluid removal rate.
  • In predilution the blood is diluted with the replacement solution before it reaches the hemofilter. Predilution is recommended when fluid removal of more than 10 liters/day are required.

The ultrafiltrate contains a lower concentration of waste product in postdilution than in prediluation fluid replacement.

The fluid removal and replacement rates are controlled by a- Gravity method which is suitable for ultrfiltration rate of up to 10 liters/day. b- Two pump method in which the ultrafiltrate and fluid replacement are dialed by IV infusion pumps. It is suitable for ultrafiltration rates up to 10-20 liters /day

f-Anticoagulation

Prolonged anticoagulation is required in CAVH to prevent clotting in extracorporeal circuit and to extend hemofilter span life and performance with minimal side effects to the patient. A loading dose of 500 - 2000 heparin is usually injected into the arterial line followed by maintenance dose of 10 units/kg/hour [6]. PTT to be measured every 6-12 hours  keeping the systemic PTT about 150% of the baseline.

Heparin-free, regional heparinization, and regional citrate anticoagulation are also applicable to patients with liver disease, active or recent bleeding, heparin induced thrombocytopenia or in postoperative patients.

Top

Prescription of CAVH [7]

The rate  of urea production by the body is directly dependent on the rate at which the protein (ingested and endogenous ) and amino acids are broken down. Urea nitrogen generation rate ranges from 5 to 10 gm / day. The higher the urea nitrogen generation rate  the great the need to increase urea clearance per day.

Plasma urea clearance in postdilution CAVH urea concentration of the ultrafiltrate is approximately equal to the plasma. Urea clearance is simply equal to ultrafiltrate volume. In predilution however urea clearance can be calculated by the following formula:

 Urea clearance = Ultrfiltrate volume X  Ultrafiltrate urea concentration   X 0.85

Plasma urea concentration

 

Table 1 shows CAVH schedule according to the patient catabolic state

 

Patient category

Desired plasma urea clearance /day*

Not hypercatabolic and has residual renal function

5-10 liters

Not hypercatabolic and has  no residual renal function

8-15 liters

Hypercatabolic with minimal or no residual renal function

15-25 liters

* multiplied by 1 on post dilution and by 1.2 on prediluation

Top

Nursing care in CAVH

·        Patient and or family education about the purpose and function of CAVH

·        A baseline assessment , including clinical history, the patient's weight and physical examination,.

·        Hamodynamic profile is essential. It includes vital signs, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressure. pulmonary capillary wedge pressures and arterial pressures

 

·        Baseline laboratory data; hemogram, coagulation profile, and chemistry .

·        Establish the vascular access aseptically.

·        The hemofilter and lines are primed, heparinised and attached to the patient (according to manufacture's instruction)

·        The hemofilter must be secured carefully to the patient to avoid accidental disconnection.

·        Continuous care; Hemodynamic profile, patients fluid status,  pulses distal to the access, blood flow, blood lines, hemofilter, ultrafiltration rate, laboratory values.

·        Hourly record of ultrafiltrate.

Top

Positives and Negatives of CAVH

Positives of CAVH: [8,9,10]

·        The main advantage of CAVH over intermittent conventional hemodialysis is the patient's cardiovascular stability during the procedure.

·        CAVH provides an alternative option to peritoneal dialysis for patients with intra-abdominal sepsis or recent abdominal surgery

·        Continuous and smooth blood purification with clearance rate of about 9.5  ml/minute are achieved .

·        Precise control of body fluid,  electrolyte and acid base abnormalities in oligoanuric patients are easier. CAVH has been shown to be beneficial when parenteral nutrition is indicated.

·        CAVH is a simple and safe procedure to treat critically ill patient - ease of initiation and technically less demanding.

Negatives of CAVH [7,9,10]

·        Access related:

      Thrombosis of femoral artery                     Emolization of atherosclerotic plaque

      Retroperitoneal  or local hematoma              False aneurysm

      Femoral arteriovenous fistula

·        Require strict fluid and electrolyte monitoring to avoid fluid and electrolyte imbalance.

·        Bleeding ; local - overhepranization. In patient with systemic bleeding the advantages and the risk must be weighted.

·        Hemofilter malfunction ;

     Clotting should be suspected when blood lines becomes dark and or reduction of

     ultrfiltrate volume. Hemofilter leak and rupture also may occur.

     Decreased blood flow may indicate vascular access problem and or low blood pressure.

·         Inadequate solute clearance in severely hypercatabolic and hyperkalaemic patients.

·         Access site infection

Conclusion

Acute renal failure and the associated water overload are common problems in critically ill patients and contribute significantly to mortality. Such patients are often hemodynamically unstable and can not tolerate conventional hemodialysis. Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration provides a simple and safe renal replacement therapy for such critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units.  It is possible  that patients who develop acute renal failure could be managed using Continuous Arteriovenous Hemofiltration in hospitals which do not have an associated dialysis unit.

Top

References

1-Kramer P, Wigger W, Rieger J, et al :Arteriovenous hemofiltration : A new simple method for treatment of overhydrated patients resista nt to diuretics. Klin Wochenscher 1977;55:1121-1122.

2-Kramer P, Schrader J, Bohnsack W, et al Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration.A new kidney replacement therapy. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc. 1981;18:743-749.

3-Morgan SH, Mansell MA, Thompson FD. Fluid removal by hemofiltrationin diuretic resistant cardiac failure. Br Heart J. 1985;54:218-219

4-Ronco C, Brendolan A, Bragantini L, Chiaramonte S, et  al Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration with AN69S membrane; procedures and experience. Kid international 1988,33 s24:150-153.

5-Bjork S, Delfin K, Mathillas O et al , Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration: A simple method to improve the efficiency. A technical note. Scan J Uro Nephrol 1985;19:29:295-296

6-Kramer  P, Bohler J, Kehr A, et al Intensive care potential of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Tran Am Soc Artif Intern Organs .1982;28:28-32.

7-Miles H, Sigler, Brenan P, et al Slow Continuous therapies. Handbook f dialysis 1994;169-197.

8-Kramer P, Kaufhold G, Grone HJ, et al.. Management of anuric intensive-care patients with arteriovenous hemofiltration. Int J Artif Organs 1980;3:225-230.

9-Lauer A, Saccaggi A, Ronco C et al. Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in critically ill patient. Clinical use operational characteristics. Ann Int Med 1983;99:455-490.

10-Dodd  NJ, Turney JH, Parsons V, et al. Continuos  hemofiltration maintains  fluid balance and reduces hemodialysis requirements in acute renal failure. Proc Dial Transplant Assoc. 1982; 19:329-333.

 Top